![]() ![]() What they discovered was that not one word held up to the slightest scrutiny. However, just two weeks later, Bloomberg did something that The New York Times apparently never considered: They sent a reporter to Ukraine and checked up on Giuliani’s claims. When that was written, on May 2, 2019, there was still some belief that Burisma might have actually benefited from the removal of that prosecutor, whose name was Viktor Shokin. In the next election, the prosecutor was voted out, and Ukraine got its funds. funds if Ukraine didn’t clean up its act. ![]() This prosecutor was one of several figures whom Joe Biden railed against on a trip to Ukraine in which he complained about corruption in the country’s government, including a threat to withhold U.S. To see just how close they are to what Jordan is saying now, let’s look at what Daily Kos wrote then: At the heart of the charge Trump is making against Biden is this: Biden’s son Hunter was on the board of an energy company called Burisma Holdings that was targeted by a Ukrainian prosecutor. Trump immediately picked up those claims and leveled them at then-undeclared candidate Joe Biden. To steal the opening from the last two “Spider Man” animated features: Let’s do this one more time.Īll of this business about Joe Biden and Burisma goes back to May 2019 and an article that appeared in The New York Times that gave Rudy Giuliani an open mic to make a set of unchallenged claims. It’s not really possible to feel sorry for Jordan, but it is possible to feel a level of astonishment over just what level of pathetic-patheticness? pathegnosity?-he is willing to reach in order to justify his actions. ![]() And then five days later, the vice president of the United States, the current president of the United States, goes to Ukraine and starts the process into getting the prosecutor fired.” I don’t know who they talked to in D.C.’ Now, come on. 4, 2015, Devon Archer and Hunter Biden are meeting with the head of Burisma, Mr. ” told Ukraine, ‘If you don’t fire the prosecutor, you’re not getting the money.’ That’s exactly what they accused President Trump of doing, which he didn’t do and they impeached him over that. Here’s what Jordan tried to sell on Fox & Friends as justification for an impeachment inquiry. Only what he’s trotting out for the Fox & Friends crowd has a slight problem: It’s all just a scam that blew up on Republicans four years ago. (See: Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, or the other five investigations into Benghazi.) But an impeachment inquiry seems like it should have at least some tiny scrap of evidence to justify its existence. The public could-and has-cheerfully ignored the performance art that three Republican-run committees have been executing with no obvious goal other than to allow them to send out daily fundraising requests that include the phrase “Hunter Biden’s laptop.” People expect Republicans to run pointless inquiries into the same thing over and over again. On Tuesday, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy declared that he was turning three Republican investigations that have already been running since January into “impeachment inquiries” on the basis of … of … well, on the basis of how McCarthy is scared sh-less that the members of his own party might come to collect on all the promises he made to get his big office.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |